Ward 12 · Greater Sudbury
A problem vs the root of the problem
We have to look at the city as a whole, not one budget line at a time.
The saving available by cutting a single item is not the question. The question is what that cut does across every other city function. A cut can book a saving in one department and create larger costs in three others, and it will still show up on paper as a saving. That is a false sense of savings.
The council holds the wide view. Managers see the impact of changes within their own silo. Council's job is to follow up and make sure obvious issues from other departments are managed, and missed issues are addressed quickly.
Lower levels of service lead to snowballing costs
Over time, our city has reduced the amount of snow it removes vs plows, leaving higher snowbanks, and less friendly winter streets. The upfront savings seem clear, but the impacts down the line aren't being measured. Seniors and those with mobility issues struggle to clear snowbanks, or are forced to walk on roadways instead of sidewalks, some deciding to not leave their homes for significant portions of the winter season. In the spring, it also creates a significant problem of melt water that freezes when the sun gets low, requiring increased sand usage at another new cost, then additional need for sweeping, later into the season, increasing the chances of flooding.
Less service, more pests
We have what appears to be a growing rat problem. It's too early to identify the source, but it comes after a move to bi-weekly garbage. A review of what's changed is key, as is making sure we aren't exacerbating the issue. The reasons for reducing garbage pickup included improving diversion of organic waste, and recyclables. Those goals are great, but we need an update on the full impacts of those changes, then look at other options to achieve and exceed those goals, including improving the private sector's ability to divert waste.
Getting our construction seasons back on the right road
Manage a road project poorly and you have quietly shrunk the commercial tax base.
While our roads are a bigger issue, the process of getting them repaired needs serious improvement. We need to be more predictable about when work is going to be done, and neighbourhoods need more notice that it's coming. Our businesses need the predictability more than a year out so that they can mitigate the costs, pre-arrange vacations when construction will be at its worst, and put money aside for lost sales.
When the underlying infrastructure is uncertain (which happens on older roads), jobs need to start as early as possible in the season so that repairs can be completed in a single season, and have the cushion needed for unexpected surprises.
How one long project reaches your tax bill
That is not just an inconvenience, it affects your quality of life. When construction runs long in front of a business or happens when they aren't prepared, the business earns less, or worse, closes. Earning less makes the rent harder to pay. Trouble paying rent devalues properties, and low property values mean less tax revenue. Putting more of the tax burden on residents, reducing budgets to catch up on infrastructure, making the next job harder (and your tires flatter).
The cycle
A saving on paper
- Project runs long
- People avoid the area
- The businesses earn less
- Rent gets harder to pay
- The tax base shrinks
- Streets aren't properly maintained
- Roads are worse than expected
A thriving commercial and industrial sector takes the property tax weight off of residents, giving the city the ability to provide a high quality of life, functioning infrastructure and reasonable tax rates.
Other cities have already built this
- 70%+Cut in para-transit wait times in Winnipeg, credited to its staff improvement work
- 4,300Halifax employees who answered its most recent staff survey
- 2026The year Winnipeg opened idea submission to every city employee
Winnipeg gives every employee a way to put an improvement forward, funds a trained team to act on the good ones, and reports what came of it to elected officials every year. Halifax publishes what its staff said and what changed because of it. Neither is exotic and neither is expensive. Sudbury has surveyed its own staff before. What we do not have is a standing route for a good idea to travel, or a yearly account of what it saved.
I've had the opportunity to deal with many of Sudbury's departments. I know how they interact, and I know where the communication between them breaks down, leaving blockers in place creating hidden hurdles. That is what tells me which questions to ask, so that one department's saving does not quietly become another department's cost. I have run projects that depend on each other, where one blocker hides far more issues than the apparent cost saving shows.
What I would do at the table
- Find out what other cities experienced when cutting costs first
- Measure the cross organization impacts after
- Give front line staff a tool to share the impacts they see
- Report back on what it saved or didn't regardless of the outcome
It's about being inquisitive up front, and about realizing decisions aren't final. They are part of a system of continuous improvement. It's about ensuring front line staff see the impact of their work, and making sure the opportunities they spot reach the decision makers instead of getting lost halfway up the chain.
We regreened this city, from barren black rock to a city of forests and lakes, by continuously learning and improving from the roots to the tree tops.
We can work together to make our city one of continuous improvement, not one jumping from fire to fire.
